posted 08-23-2006 06:55 PM
I knew that would get your attention.necro-post = reviving a dead discussion thread (according to my 14 year-old)
I was informed that my countermeasure case
http://www.raymondnelson.us/qc/060401.html
confessed to the crime after a courtroom breakdown.
discussed here.
http://www.polygraphplace.com/cgi-bin/ubbcgi/forumdisplay.cgi?action=displayprivate&number=11&topic=000274
The first test, with another examiner, the gentleman was clear of the alleged sexual assault. I reviewed that test, and the video recording reveals the subject discussed with the examiner that his wife had read about the polygraph. The test data are quite messy, and I could not support the earlier test.
Yet another reason for a good QA protocol. Such false-negatives only make us look like puppets and pawns of our consumers, whether attorneys, social services, or probation.
There are other interesting cases in Colorado, I just can't think of one right now.
------------------
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the war room."
--(Dr. Strangelove, 1964)